Scaling Teams 7 min read

Your First 10 Engineering Hires: What Most Founders Get Wrong

The mistakes I see founders make when building their initial engineering team, and the framework that actually works for startups hiring their first developers.

DM

Donatella Massafra

Founder & HR Leader

Your First 10 Engineering Hires: What Most Founders Get Wrong

I have helped over 50 startups build their founding engineering teams. And I have watched the same mistakes repeat themselves so many times that I can now predict them before they happen.

The first 10 engineering hires are not just about filling seats. They define your technical culture, your velocity, and ultimately whether your product will succeed. Get them wrong, and you spend the next two years cleaning up the mess.

Here is what I have learned.

Mistake 1: Hiring for skills, not for stage

A Staff Engineer from Google is not automatically the right first hire for your seed-stage startup. In fact, they are often the wrong one.

Your first engineers need to be builders, not specialists. They need to be comfortable with ambiguity, willing to wear multiple hats, and excited about working without established processes. That is a very different profile from someone who has spent five years inside a well-oiled machine.

What to look for instead:

  • Previous experience at early-stage companies (even if it was a failed one)
  • Evidence of shipping end-to-end, not just contributing to a component
  • Comfort with making decisions without perfect information
  • Genuine excitement about your problem space, not just your tech stack

Mistake 2: Skipping the job description

“We are a startup, we do not need formal job descriptions.” I hear this constantly. It is wrong.

A job description is not bureaucracy. It is alignment. Without one, every interviewer evaluates candidates against their own mental model of the role. You end up with five interviewers, five different standards, and a confused candidate.

Your job description does not need to be a 3-page corporate document. But it does need to answer:

  1. What will this person own in the first 90 days?
  2. What does success look like at 6 months?
  3. What are the 3-4 non-negotiable skills?
  4. What is the compensation range?

That last point matters more than you think. Transparency about comp from the start eliminates 80% of offer-stage negotiations.

Mistake 3: Moving too slowly

In a competitive market, speed is your only advantage against bigger companies. You cannot match their salaries, their brand recognition, or their perks. But you can make decisions in 48 hours instead of 4 weeks.

The startup hiring speed framework:

  • First response to application: within 24 hours
  • Screening call to final interview: maximum 10 business days
  • Offer decision: within 48 hours of final interview
  • Total process: 2-3 weeks, not 6-8

Every additional day in your process is a day where your top candidate is talking to three other companies.

Mistake 4: Ignoring culture fit (or over-indexing on it)

Culture fit is real and important. But most founders get it wrong in one of two ways:

Under-indexing: Hiring purely on technical skill and hoping the culture sorts itself out. It does not. One toxic engineer can destroy a 5-person team’s productivity.

Over-indexing: Hiring people who look, think, and act exactly like the founders. This creates a monoculture that struggles to solve diverse problems and alienates anyone who does not fit the mold.

The better frame is culture contribution. Ask: what does this person add to our culture that we are currently missing?

Mistake 5: Not having a compensation philosophy

“We will figure it out as we go” is how you end up with two engineers at the same level, doing the same work, with a 30% pay gap. When they find out — and they will — you have a retention crisis.

Before your first hire, decide:

  • Are you paying market rate, above, or below with equity to compensate?
  • How do you value equity? What is the vesting schedule?
  • What is your policy on remote vs. in-office compensation adjustments?
  • Will you have compensation bands or negotiate individually?

You do not need a 50-page comp framework. You need a one-page philosophy that you can articulate consistently to every candidate.

Mistake 6: Outsourcing the hiring decision

As a founder, you should be involved in every one of the first 10 hires. Not as a formality at the end, but as an active participant in the process.

This does not mean you should do all the sourcing and screening. Get help with that — a recruiter, a fractional HR partner, whatever makes sense. But the final decision on whether someone joins your founding team should have your fingerprints on it.

Why? Because the first 10 people are not just employees. They are co-builders. They will shape decisions that last for years. You need to be confident in every one of them.

Mistake 7: Neglecting onboarding

You spent 6 weeks finding the perfect engineer. They accepted your offer. They start on Monday.

What happens next?

In too many startups, the answer is: “Here is your laptop, here is Slack, good luck.” This is how you lose people in the first 90 days.

A structured onboarding does not require a big HR team. It requires intentionality:

  • Week 1: Set up, meet the team, understand the architecture, ship something small
  • Week 2-4: Pair with a buddy on meaningful work, not just bug fixes
  • Month 2: Own a feature end-to-end
  • Month 3: Give and receive feedback, align on growth trajectory

The first 90 days set the tone for the entire tenure. Invest in them.

The framework that works

After seeing what works and what does not across dozens of startups, here is the framework I recommend:

  1. Write the role before you open the role. Job description, compensation range, interview process — all decided before you source a single candidate.

  2. Move fast but deliberately. Speed in process execution, not in decision-making. Take the time to evaluate properly, but do not let logistics slow you down.

  3. Hire for your current stage, not your aspiration. You need builders now. You can hire specialists later when you have the infrastructure to support them.

  4. Build your interview process like a product. Iterate on it. Get feedback from candidates. Measure your pass-through rates. Treat it as something you ship and improve.

  5. Invest in the first 90 days. Onboarding is not a nice-to-have. It is how you protect your hiring investment.

The first 10 hires are the hardest and the most consequential. Get them right, and everything that follows becomes easier.

Need help with this?

Book a free 30-minute consultation and let’s discuss how TalentScale can help your team.

DM

Donatella Massafra

Founder & HR Leader

With 15+ years of international HR experience in the technology sector, leading people functions across SaaS, FinTech, HealthTech, and AI companies. Passionate about helping tech companies build world-class teams.

hiring startups engineering founders